Skip to main content

Photoshop "Magic"

Websites don't just appear out of nowhere like a rabbit in a hat.

I recently read an article from the Huffington Post called Survey Proves We Still Really Need To Talk About Photoshop which stated that...
"Fifteen percent of 18 to 24-year-olds surveyed, were convinced that the images of models and celebrities in advertisements, magazines and billboards accurately depict what these women look like in real life. Differentiating between Photoshop and real life is hard enough when a woman is aware of the airbrushing that probably went on; it becomes much harder when she isn't even given the basic facts."
And this 
One Poll reported that "33% of the women polled also feel the body they aspire towards is not possible for them to achieve."
There may be a Magic Wand in Photoshop, but it isn't magic.
 As a graphic designer, I don't find this surprising at all. I've been working as a private contractor and freelancer in graphic design for over 2 years. Just in that short time I have encountered many folks, young and old, who think all Photoshop takes is a wave of a magic wand. I kid you not, clients have thought that with programs I use like Photoshop you just put in some sort of artistic equation and out pops the end result. In reality, that's not how it is at all.

Knowing how to use Photoshop not only requires knowledge of the program, but of things like artistic elements, use of space, typography, how to prepare something for print, web DPI vs print DPI, there's so many little things that add up to a lot of skills. 


 Not everyone is an artist, and not everyone is a good graphic designer. My question is how COULD people who aren't Photoshop savvy know? If I wasn't a graphic designer myself I probably wouldn't know how much you can manipulate an image in a program. You can literally make something out of nothing and alter anything. I went to school for graphic design, and had a few people in my class that were computer savvy but they couldn't design anything decently. It sounds judgmental, but lets face it; some of us are more technical minded and some more artistically inclined. A segment of my course was to learn how to alter models for magazines, which is an in demand job. We had fun with it, quickly turning the tables and taking models and making them look freakish purposefully. Other than that, I have never used Photoshop for those kinds of purposes. I am guilty of clone brushing out a few blemishes on my face at times, but that's it.

 Photoshop can be used in some pretty scary ways. These days celebrities don't even need to "accidentally" leak a nude photo, people can Photoshop their face onto a nude body. Photoshop has been used for political reasons as well, manipulating the size of the audience the candidate is speaking to. Models bodies being altered is just the beginning. There's so much being done with Photoshop these days. While I personally don't buy into the beauty magazine thing, many women and girls do. Photoshop is not magic but Photoshop alters reality. This is a wacky thing to wrap out heads around, but that's the reality we are living in now. Now, more than ever, don't just believe what you see. More and more folks are being fooled by Photoshopped images.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The album art of Tommy by Mike McInnerney

 People often ask me what my favorite album is. Without much thought I am able to answer them. The Who's 1969 album "Tommy" is my favorite record of all time. The album artwork also happens to be my favorite. Recently I was thinking about the album and how it affected me in my life. I decided to look up the Tommy album art and was surprised that I was unable to find any of it. I could find the cover, but never all the album art inside. The Tommy CD comes with a booklet with lyrics and a series of different illustrations. But they weren't on the internet.   So this blog will be changing that! I just took out my CD booklet and scanned all the artwork. There are two versions of the cover, one featuring small images of their faces inserted into the gaps in the central sphere. The other is just the original work. Executives at The Who's record label insisted on having the band members pictured on the cover, so that's why there are two covers. Pete Tow...
1 comment
Read more

The Duck Walk

 In honor of Angus Young's birthday today I've posted a little bit about his famous stage moves which he channeled from Chuck Berry. Angus, of course had his own more erratic spin on the dance move and made it his own. Check out the difference... "A one-legged hop routine, and the "duck walk", which he first used as a child when he walked "stooping with full-bended knees, but with my back and head vertical" under a table to retrieve a ball and his family found it entertaining; he used it when "performing in New York for the first time and some journalist branded it the duck walk." I love this guy's "Duck walk tutorial". "Just follow these easy steps...literally."
Post a Comment
Read more

[REVISED] Eddie Vedder's voice, the most emulated voice in music history?

  Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder has one of the most distinct and emulated voices in contemporary rock music. I feel like I spent the entire 90's hearing alternative bands copying Eddie's singing style. Just to show you how many artists have been said to sound like Eddie Vedder throughout time; Creed's Scott Stapp, Fuel's Brett Scallions, The Stone Temple Pilot's Scott Weiland, The Calling's Alex Band, Soundgarden's Chris Cornell, Lifehouse's Jason Wade, and some say Nickelback's Chad Kroeger have a similar sounding voice (don't shoot the messenger). And probably more than I can remember.  When I continued to look into this stream of vocals that sounded the same, I came upon a quite obvious realization. Whether they know it or not, they are actually emulating Jim Morrison. It also makes sense that Eddie later played with the remaining Doors members and inducted them into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. This singing style wasn't just ho...
1 comment
Read more